On 04/11/2016 02:04 PM, Sven R. Kunze wrote:
On 11.04.2016 22:55, Alexander Walters wrote:
Every conceivable way to fix pathlib have already been argued. Are any
of them worth doing? Can we get consensus enough to implement one of
them? If not, we should consider either dropping the matter or
dropping the module.
Right now, I don't see pathlib removed. Why? Because using strings alone
has its caveats (we all know that). So, I cannot imagine an alternative
concept to pathlib right now. We might call it differently, but the
concept stays unchanged.
We've pretty decided that we have two options:
1. remove pathlib
2. make the stdlib work with pathlib
So we're trying to make option 2 work before falling back to option 1.
If you have a way to make pathlib work with the stdlib that doesn't
involve "fixing" os and os.path, now is the time to speak up.
--
~Ethan~
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
