> On Apr 12, 2016, at 10:52 AM, Sven R. Kunze <srku...@mail.de> wrote: > > Path(...).open() is your friend then. I don't see why you need os.open. > > Refusing to upgrade it like saying, everything was better in the old days. So > let's use os.open instead of Path(...).open().
I think it was a mistake to have Path(…).open to be honest and I think the main reason it exists is because open(Path(…)) doesn’t work (yet!). You can’t hang every single thing you might ever want to do to a Path off the path object. ----------------- Donald Stufft PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
