2016-04-14 17:27 GMT+02:00 Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org>: > Great analysis! What might stand in the way of adoption is concern for > bytecode manipulation libraries that would have to be changed. > (...) > There's also talk of switching to wordcode, in a different thread.
I agree that breaking backward compatibility just for MAKE_FUNCTION is not worth. But if we accept the wordcode change, IMHO it's ok to take this as an opportunity to also modify MAKE_FUNCTION. > Maybe the idea would be easier to introduce there? (Bytecode libraries > would have to change anyways, so the additional concern for this > change would be minimal.) Exactly ;-) Victor _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
