2016-04-14 22:50 GMT+02:00 Barry Warsaw <ba...@python.org>: > Although I'm not totally convinced, I won't continue to object. You've > provided some performance numbers in the PEP even without FAT, and you aren't > exposing the API to Python, so it's not a burden being imposed on other > implementations.
Cool! Ah right, the PEP evolved since its first version sent to python-ideas. I didn't recall the full context of the discussion. The PEP is now more complete and it has more known (future) use cases ;-) (now maybe also Cython?) Victor _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
