This has just been discussed very recently in this thread (and earlier too). It may make sense, but it's not among our current worries. Besides, we already added the new fspath semantics to the PEP.
While I hope Brett is asleep in his time zone, I'm guessing he will agree (just saying this because you write "@Brett"). -- Koos On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Sven R. Kunze <srku...@mail.de> wrote: > On 12.05.2016 18:24, Guido van Rossum wrote: >> >> def fspath(p: Union[str, bytes, PathLike]) -> Union[str, bytes]: >> if isinstance(p, (str, bytes)): >> return p >> try: >> return p.__fspath__ >> except AttributeError: >> raise TypeError(...) > > > @Brett > Would you think it makes sense to swap the str/bytes check and the > __fspath__ check? > > > I just thought of a class subclassing str/bytes and defines __fspath__. Its > __fspath__ method would be ignored currently. > > > Best, > Sven > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/k7hoven%40gmail.com _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
