I'm reviewing this now. Martin, can you please submit the new version of your PEP as a Pull Request to the new peps repo on GitHub? https://github.com/python/peps
--Guido On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 7:45 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 14 July 2016 at 00:15, Martin Teichmann <lkb.teichm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi list, >> >> another round for PEP 487, is there any chance it still makes it into >> Python 3.6? >> >> The PEP should be effectively done, I updated the examples in it, >> given that I implemented the PEP I could actually test the examples, >> so now they work. >> >> The implementation is at http://bugs.python.org/issue27366, including >> documentation and tests. Unfortunately nobody has reviewed the patch >> yet. >> >> The new version of the PEP is attached. > > +1 from me for this version - between them, this and PEP 520 address > everything I hoped to achieve with PEP 422, and a bit more besides. > > There's no BDFL delegation in place for this one though, so it's > really Guido's +1 that you need :) > > Cheers, > Nick. > > -- > Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
