FWIW I copied the version you posted into the peps repo already, since it provides a significant update to the last version there.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote: > I'm reviewing this now. > > Martin, can you please submit the new version of your PEP as a Pull > Request to the new peps repo on GitHub? https://github.com/python/peps > > --Guido > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 7:45 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 14 July 2016 at 00:15, Martin Teichmann <lkb.teichm...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi list, >>> >>> another round for PEP 487, is there any chance it still makes it into >>> Python 3.6? >>> >>> The PEP should be effectively done, I updated the examples in it, >>> given that I implemented the PEP I could actually test the examples, >>> so now they work. >>> >>> The implementation is at http://bugs.python.org/issue27366, including >>> documentation and tests. Unfortunately nobody has reviewed the patch >>> yet. >>> >>> The new version of the PEP is attached. >> >> +1 from me for this version - between them, this and PEP 520 address >> everything I hoped to achieve with PEP 422, and a bit more besides. >> >> There's no BDFL delegation in place for this one though, so it's >> really Guido's +1 that you need :) >> >> Cheers, >> Nick. >> >> -- >> Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia >> _______________________________________________ >> Python-Dev mailing list >> Python-Dev@python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev >> Unsubscribe: >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org > > > > -- > --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
