On Thu, 4 May 2017 11:24:27 +0900 INADA Naoki <songofaca...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, Nick and all core devs who are interested in this PEP. > > I'm reviewing PEP 538 and I want to accept it in this month. > It will reduces much UnicodeError pains which server-side OPs facing. > Thank you Nick for working on this PEP. > > If you have something worrying about this PEP, please post a comment > soon. If you don't have enough time to read entire this PEP, feel free to > ask a question about you're worrying.
>From my POV, it is problematic that the behaviour outlined in PEP 538 (see Abstract section) varies depending on the adoption of another PEP (PEP 540). If we want to adopt PEP 538 before pronouncing on PEP 540, then PEP 538 should remove all points conditional on PEP 540 adoption, and PEP 540 should later be changed to adopt those removed points as PEP 540-specific changes. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
