On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 1:25 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote: > On Thu, 4 May 2017 11:24:27 +0900 > INADA Naoki <songofaca...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, Nick and all core devs who are interested in this PEP. >> >> I'm reviewing PEP 538 and I want to accept it in this month. >> It will reduces much UnicodeError pains which server-side OPs facing. >> Thank you Nick for working on this PEP. >> >> If you have something worrying about this PEP, please post a comment >> soon. If you don't have enough time to read entire this PEP, feel free to >> ask a question about you're worrying. > > From my POV, it is problematic that the behaviour outlined in PEP 538 > (see Abstract section) varies depending on the adoption of another PEP > (PEP 540). > > If we want to adopt PEP 538 before pronouncing on PEP 540, then PEP 538 > should remove all points conditional on PEP 540 adoption, and PEP 540 > should later be changed to adopt those removed points as PEP > 540-specific changes. > > Regards > > Antoine. >
Fair enough. I stop hurrying about PEP 538 and start reviewing PEP 540. Thanks, _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
