On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 11:21 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > As the original proponent of a Dynamic* naming scheme, I'll note that > I eventually decided I didn't like it for the same reason I already > didn't like naming schemes using either the word "local" or the word > "frame": they all suggest a coupling to the synchronous call stack > that deliberately isn't part of the proposal. >
However, there is still *some* connection with the frame, though it's subtle. In particular the LC (using PEP v3 terms) for a generator is tied to that generator's frame (it becomes the top of the EC stack whenever that generator is resumed). I don't think we should call this out in the naming scheme though. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
