I think that "implicit context" is not an accurate description of what
LogicalContext is.
"implicit context" only makes sense when we talk about decimal
context. For instance, in:
Decimal(1) + Decimal(2)
decimal context is implicit. But this is "implicit" from the
standpoint of that code. Decimal will manage its context
*explicitly*.
Fixing decimal context is only one part of the PEP though. EC will
also allow to implement asynchronous task locals:
current_request = new_context_key()
async def handle_http_request(request):
current_request.set(request)
Here we explicitly set and will explicitly get values from the EC. We
will explicitly manage the EC in asyncio.Task and when we schedule
callbacks.
Values stored in the EC are essentially globals (or TLS), which we
don't call "implicit" in Python.
PEP 550 calls generators and asynchronous tasks as "logical threads",
and "logical context" stems directly from that notion.
"implicit" only covers one part of what LC really is. It implies that
all EC/LC operations are implicit, which they are not.
Logical Context is a neutral abstract term. Implicit Context bears a
specific meaning that I don't think is accurate.
Yury
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
