If it sounds as there is no need or is unnecessary to you then it its ok :-), thank you for the feedback ! I'm just curious on:
On 10/21/2017 05:45 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: > That sounds like unnecessary generality, Meaning that the selection of precision on running time 'costs'? I understand that one can just multiply/divide the nanoseconds returned, (or it could be a factory) but wouldn't it help for future enhancements to reduce the number of functions (the 'pico' question)? > and also suggests that the API > might support precisions way beyond what is realistic. Doesn't that depends on the offered/supported enums (in that case down to 'ns' as Victor proposed) ? Thanks, --francis _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
