Hello, On Mon, 6 Nov 2017 11:33:10 -0800 Barry Warsaw <ba...@python.org> wrote:
[] > If we did make the change, it’s possible we would need a way to > explicit say that order is not preserved. That seems a little weird I recently was working on a more or less complex dataflow propagation problem. It should converge to a fixed point, and it did, but on different runs, to different ones. So, I know that I'm a bad programmer, need to do more of my homework and grow. I know, that if I rewrite it in C++ or C, it'll work unstable the same way, because it's buggy. (Heck, over these years, I learned that I don't need to rewrite things in C/C++, because Python is the *real* language, which works the way computers do, without sugaring that up). I need to remember that, because with Python 3.7, I may become a good-programmer-in-a-ponyland-of-ordered-dicts. Btw, in all this discussion, I don't remember anyone mentioning sets. I don't recall the way they're implemented in CPython, but they have strong conceptual and semantic resemblance to dict's. So, what about them, do they become ordered too? > > Cheers, > -Barry > -- Best regards, Paul mailto:pmis...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
