I didn't follow the discussion on the PEP but I was surprised to read "from __future__ import annotations" in an example. Annotations exist since Python 3.0, why would Python 3.7 require a future for them? Well, I was aware of the PEP, but I was confused anyway.
I really prefer "from __future__ import string_annotations" ! Victor Le 10 nov. 2017 03:14, "Nick Coghlan" <ncogh...@gmail.com> a écrit : > On 10 November 2017 at 05:51, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote: > > If we have to change the name I'd vote for string_annotations -- "lazy" > has > > too many other connotations (e.g. it might cause people to think it's the > > thunks). I find str_annotations too abbreviated, and > stringify_annotations > > is too hard to spell. > > Aye, I'd be fine with "from __future__ import string_annotations" - > that's even more explicitly self-documenting than either of my > suggestions. > > Cheers, > Nick. > > -- > Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ > victor.stinner%40gmail.com >
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
