On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 5:24 AM, Random832 <random...@fastmail.com> wrote:
> You're completely missing the context of the discussion, which was the > supposed reason that a *new* function call operator, with the proposed > syntax function?(args), that would short-circuit (based on the > 'function' being None) could not be implemented. The whole thing doesn't > make sense to me anyway, since a new operator could have its own > sequence different from the existing one if necessary. > ​Right, I was clearly misinterpreting the wording in the PEP. It's a bit ambiguous and should probably make explicit that "evaluate the function" isn't just the common vernacular for "call the function".
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
