The PEP 555 looks a competitor PEP of the PEP 567. Since the Yury's PEP 567 was approved, I understand that Koos's PEP 555 should be rejected, no?
Victor 2018-01-23 0:52 GMT+01:00 Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org>: > Yury, > > I am hereby *accepting* the latest version of PEP 567[1]. Congrats! > > --Guido > > [1] > https://github.com/python/peps/commit/a459539920b9b8c8394ef61058e88a076ef8b133#diff-9d0ccdec754459da5f665cc6c6b2cc06 > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 9:30 AM, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote: >> >> There has been useful and effective discussion on several of the finer >> points of PEP 567. I think we've arrived at a solid specification, where >> every part of the design is well motivated. I plan to accept it on Monday, >> unless someone brings up something significant that we've overlooked before >> then. Please don't rehash issues that have already been debated -- we're >> unlikely to reach a different conclusion upon revisiting the same issue >> (read the Rejected Ideas section first). >> >> -- >> --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) > > > > > -- > --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/victor.stinner%40gmail.com > _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
