On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 2:23 AM, Victor Stinner <victor.stin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The PEP 555 looks a competitor PEP of the PEP 567. Since the Yury's > PEP 567 was approved, I understand that Koos's PEP 555 should be > rejected, no? > > If Guido prefers to reject it, I assume he'll say so. Anyway, it's still waiting for me to add references to earlier discussions and perhaps summaries of some discussions. Personally, I need to find some time to properly catch up with the latest discussion to figure out why PEP 567 is better than PEP 555 (or similar with .set(..), or PEP 550), despite problems of reasoning about the scopes of variables and unset tokens. In any case, congrats, Yury! This hasn't been an easy one for any of us, and it seems like the implementation required quite a beastly patch too in the end. —Koos
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
