On Jan 31, 2018 8:31 AM, "Ray Donnelly" <mingw.andr...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 30, 2018 6:47 PM, "Joni Orponen" <j.orpo...@4teamwork.ch> wrote: On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 6:50 PM, Ray Donnelly <mingw.andr...@gmail.com> wrote: > While we're making such macOS-build requests, any chance of building a > static interpreter too? We've been doing that on the Anaconda > Distribution since the 5.0 release in September and it seems to be > working well. > PyPy is also currently eyeing doing their macOS builds better: https://bitbucket.org/pypy/pypy/issues/2734/establis h-a-build-and-release-pipeline-for What do the Anaconda static builds get built on? We have our own clang pseudo cross-compilers and use a macOS 10.9 SDK for all of our package compilation to achieve compatibility (this means we can compile on newer macOS just fine). We see a 1.1 to 1.2 times performance benefit over official releases as measured using 'python performance'. Apart from a static interpreter we also enable LTO and PGO and only build for 64-bit so I'm not sure how much each bit continues. Our recipe for python 3.6 can be found at: s/continues/contributes/ https://github.com/AnacondaRecipes/python-feedstock/tree/master/recipe -- Joni Orponen _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/mingw. android%40gmail.com
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
