> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 02/27/2012 08:28 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > >> > >> On 18/01/12 14:01, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > >>> It seems actually, that there are pretty straightforward > >>> guidelines for renaming packages: > >>> > >>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Renaming_Process#Re-review_required > >>> > >>> > >> > >>> > >>> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming.2FReplacing_Existing_Packages > >>> > >>> So if renaming, we will _have to_ re-review. Also, the > >>> guidelines are pretty clear with the Provides and Obsoletes, > >>> so it shouldn't really be a problem. > >>> > >>> Bohuslav. > >>> > >> OK, > >> > >> if renaming is consence, we should implement it right after > >> branching F17 in devel-tree. > >> > >> Probably one should write an example .spec, especially taking > >> care on sane requires, provides. > >> > >> Maybe we should make a wiki page to coordinate this step > >> (overview, which package is required to change, which is > >> changed, etc. > >> > >> Bohuslav, would you start such a page? We could divide up > >> reviews. I would volunteer to do some reviews. > >> > >> Matthias > > > > Hi guys, so it seems that we should get this started now, when we > > have plenty of time for Fedora. I was thinking about this a lot > > and here is what I came up with: 1) We should create a fpc ticket, > > that would summarize what we want to do, and more importantly, it > > would ask fpc to add a section about Django and its plugins to > > Python packaging guidelines. 2) Then, after approved by fpc, I will > > create a wiki page that will hold the list of Django > > plugins/extensions, that were/were not renamed. 3) Then, we should > > first review python-django, which is already in work [1], but I > > believe it might be a good idea to wait for the fpc approval, > > before we actually approve and push it. 4) Finally, we should do > > all the other packages. In case some of the packagers are not > > responsive, we should have a proven packager standing by (I know > > two personally, so that shouldn't be a problem). > > > Sounds like a good plan. I'll be travelling from Wednesday to the end > of the week, and I need to bring the python-django spec that's being > reviewed in sync with our latest Django package (and make some > changes > already mentioned in the review ticket and in Bohuslav's email), but > I'll have time to do that later this week. > > It'd be great to have this land (mea culpa: I'm the one who > originally > picked 'Django' as the package name). > > > > - -- > Michel Alexandre Salim
Here is the FPC ticket, feel free to join the discussion :) https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/146 -- Regards, Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda. _______________________________________________ python-devel mailing list python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/python-devel
