> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 02/27/2012 08:28 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > > >> > > >> On 18/01/12 14:01, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > > >>> It seems actually, that there are pretty straightforward > > >>> guidelines for renaming packages: > > >>> > > >>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Renaming_Process#Re-review_required > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >>> > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming.2FReplacing_Existing_Packages > > >>> > > >>> So if renaming, we will _have to_ re-review. Also, the > > >>> guidelines are pretty clear with the Provides and Obsoletes, > > >>> so it shouldn't really be a problem. > > >>> > > >>> Bohuslav. > > >>> > > >> OK, > > >> > > >> if renaming is consence, we should implement it right after > > >> branching F17 in devel-tree. > > >> > > >> Probably one should write an example .spec, especially taking > > >> care on sane requires, provides. > > >> > > >> Maybe we should make a wiki page to coordinate this step > > >> (overview, which package is required to change, which is > > >> changed, etc. > > >> > > >> Bohuslav, would you start such a page? We could divide up > > >> reviews. I would volunteer to do some reviews. > > >> > > >> Matthias > > > > > > Hi guys, so it seems that we should get this started now, when we > > > have plenty of time for Fedora. I was thinking about this a lot > > > and here is what I came up with: 1) We should create a fpc > > > ticket, > > > that would summarize what we want to do, and more importantly, it > > > would ask fpc to add a section about Django and its plugins to > > > Python packaging guidelines. 2) Then, after approved by fpc, I > > > will > > > create a wiki page that will hold the list of Django > > > plugins/extensions, that were/were not renamed. 3) Then, we > > > should > > > first review python-django, which is already in work [1], but I > > > believe it might be a good idea to wait for the fpc approval, > > > before we actually approve and push it. 4) Finally, we should do > > > all the other packages. In case some of the packagers are not > > > responsive, we should have a proven packager standing by (I know > > > two personally, so that shouldn't be a problem). > > > > > Sounds like a good plan. I'll be travelling from Wednesday to the > > end > > of the week, and I need to bring the python-django spec that's > > being > > reviewed in sync with our latest Django package (and make some > > changes > > already mentioned in the review ticket and in Bohuslav's email), > > but > > I'll have time to do that later this week. > > > > It'd be great to have this land (mea culpa: I'm the one who > > originally > > picked 'Django' as the package name). > > > > > > > > - -- > > Michel Alexandre Salim > > Here is the FPC ticket, feel free to join the discussion :) > https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/146 > > -- > Regards, > Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda.
Ok, so after having this approved, here is the tracking page that I came up with. I'd like you all to go through it and say if it's ok/discuss things that may not be clear. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bkabrda/Django_rename Thanks! -- Regards, Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda. _______________________________________________ python-devel mailing list python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/python-devel
