On 11-04-2024 15:30, Sandro wrote:
I see "# Package doesn't provide any tests" in the %check section.
That certainly feels a bit dodgy. This successor of a test framework
decided to ditch all of the tests it used to have? That is certainly a
red flag.
More like a chicken and egg story, maybe? If I were to provide a testing
framework, I'd very much like to use that testing framework for testing.
<insert picture of a dog chasing its own tail>
Anyway, I'll contact upstream asking them about it. It's the least I can
do. I'll also ask about the documentation link on PyPI, which points to
the RTD page of ye olde š.
Upstream uses GitHub Actions for testing. I haven't looked into how
those are set up. Apparently they also test with pynose on SeleniumBase
(same maintainer, see elsewhere in this thread).
While this still not provides us with the ability to test downstream,
all tests I've run while investigating the feasibility of my idea so far
haven't brought up any issues.
If anyone wants to chime in, here is the ticket:
https://github.com/mdmintz/pynose/issues/25
Last but not least, the documentation link on PyPI was fixed right away
and will be in the next release.
-- Sandro
--
_______________________________________________
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
