On 27 August 2016 at 23:39, Arek Bulski <arek.bul...@gmail.com> wrote: > They can be used simply out of convenience, like 4K is a shorthand for 4000. > And 9G is definitely easier to write and *therefore less prone to error* > than a full literal.
I dispute "less prone to error". Like it or not, there are a lot of people who would interpret "4K" as 4096. You can argue whether they are right or wrong all you like, but the fact remains that 4K is open to misinterpretation in a way that 4096 or 4000 is not. The (minimal) convenience of being able to write 4K rather than 4000 doesn't, in my mind, outweigh the risk. And if you're concerned about larger numbers, such as 16000000000, and the need to count zeroes, I'd argue that you should name such a constant - and Python 3.6 will allow you to write it as 16_000_000_000 in any case, making things completely clear. Paul _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
