On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:02 PM David Mertz <me...@gnosis.cx> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:59 PM, אלעזר <elaz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I don't If this feature is "nice, but does not worth the complication",
>>> then so be it; I can't claim I know better. I only speculate that it does
>>> not necessarily requires a new custom type.
> I don't mean a runtime type here (necessarily), but rather a new type for
> the parser.  I.e. transform this actual expression into some sort of
> delayed expression when parsing.
> I understood this, and that was my speculation. I will like an explanation
as to why is this necessary, but it's probably off topic.

Python-ideas mailing list
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to