On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:02 PM David Mertz <me...@gnosis.cx> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:59 PM, אלעזר <elaz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I don't If this feature is "nice, but does not worth the complication",
>>> then so be it; I can't claim I know better. I only speculate that it does
>>> not necessarily requires a new custom type.
> I don't mean a runtime type here (necessarily), but rather a new type for
> the parser. I.e. transform this actual expression into some sort of
> delayed expression when parsing.
Just as a demonstration, the parser can transform `EXP` into `lambda: EXP`
- and that's it. It will not solve everything (e.g. error messages and
.__annotation__ access as Alexander says), but it demonstrates the fact
that the change need not be so deep at all.
Python-ideas mailing list
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/