On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:02 PM David Mertz <me...@gnosis.cx> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:59 PM, אלעזר <elaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I don't If this feature is "nice, but does not worth the complication", >>> then so be it; I can't claim I know better. I only speculate that it does >>> not necessarily requires a new custom type. >>> >> > I don't mean a runtime type here (necessarily), but rather a new type for > the parser. I.e. transform this actual expression into some sort of > delayed expression when parsing. > Just as a demonstration, the parser can transform `EXP` into `lambda: EXP` - and that's it. It will not solve everything (e.g. error messages and .__annotation__ access as Alexander says), but it demonstrates the fact that the change need not be so deep at all. Elazar
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
