On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Erik Bray <erik.m.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > I haven't written this up in the proper PEP format because I want to > see if the idea has some broader support first, and it's also not > clear to me whether C-API changes (especially to undocumented APIs) > even require their own PEP. >
You're pretty close to proper PEP format. Like others, I don't have enough knowledge of threading internals to speak to the technical side of it, but this is a well-written proposal and I agree in principle with tightening this up. The need for a PEP basically comes down to whether or not it's going to be controversial; a PEP allows you to hash out the details and then present a coherent proposal to Guido (or his delegate) for final approval. ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
