Another point of view:
Some call it monkeypatching. Others call it configuration.
There's room for both views and I don't see anything wrong with
configuration using this kind of feature.
Sven
On 10.02.2017 17:17, Markus Meskanen wrote:
Well yes, but I think you're a bit too fast on labeling it a mistake
to use monkey patching...
On Feb 10, 2017 18:15, "Paul Moore" <p.f.mo...@gmail.com
<mailto:p.f.mo...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 10 February 2017 at 16:09, Markus Meskanen
<markusmeska...@gmail.com <mailto:markusmeska...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> But if people are gonna do it anyways with the tools provided
(monkey
> patching), why not provide them with better tools?
Because encouraging and making it easier for people to make mistakes
is the wrong thing to do, surely?
Paul
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/