I think, in that particular example, that is an ok solution, however if you are combining multiple booleans to create a lambda or separate function that is quite a bit of syntactical sugar to add (unless it is re-used).
H-J On 23 February 2017 at 18:11, Régis Martin <rmar...@astek.fr> wrote: > Hello, > why not using the filter function? > > for x in filter(is_prime, range(100)): > # do something with x > > This is equivalent as was mentionned at first: > > for x in range(100) if is_prime(x): > # do things with x > > Régis > > -- > Régis Martin > Directeur de Projets Astek Industrie > Tel: 06-83-53-15-05 > http://www.groupeastek.com/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list > Python-ideas@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
