Having to define objects for scripts or small projects is really adding a burden. A namedtuple litteral strike the perferfect balance between expressivity and concision for those cases.
Le 21/07/2017 à 17:18, Guido van Rossum a écrit : > Honestly I would like to declare the bare (x=1, y=0) proposal dead. > Let's encourage the use of objects rather than tuples (named or > otherwise) for most data exchanges. I know of a large codebase that uses > dicts instead of objects, and it's a mess. I expect the bare ntuple to > encourage the same chaos. > > -- > --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido <http://python.org/~guido>) > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list > Python-ideas@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ > _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
