On 22 July 2017 at 01:18, Guido van Rossum <[email protected]> wrote: > Honestly I would like to declare the bare (x=1, y=0) proposal dead. Let's > encourage the use of objects rather than tuples (named or otherwise) for > most data exchanges. I know of a large codebase that uses dicts instead of > objects, and it's a mess. I expect the bare ntuple to encourage the same > chaos.
That sounds sensible to me - given ordered keyword arguments, anything that bare syntax could do can be done with a new builtin instead, and be inherently more self-documenting as a result. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | [email protected] | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
