On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Koos Zevenhoven <k7ho...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 6:53 PM, Yury Selivanov <yselivanov...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 8:35 AM, Koos Zevenhoven <k7ho...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 3:49 AM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: >> [..] >> >> >> >> I think PEP 550 is sufficient to allow implementing all >> >> your proposed APIs (and that if it isn't, that's a bug in PEP 550). >> > >> > >> > That's not true either. The LocalContext-based semantics introduces >> > scope >> > barriers that affect *all* variables. You might get close by putting >> > just >> > one variable in a LogicalContext and then nest them, but PEP 550 does >> > not >> > allow this in all cases. With the addition of PEP 521 and some trickery, >> > it >> > might. >> >> I think you have a wrong idea about PEP 550 specification. I >> recommend you to reread it carefully, otherwise we can't have a >> productive discussion here. >> > > I'm sorry, by LocalContext I meant LogicalContext, and by "nesting" them, I > meant stacking them. It is in fact nesting in terms of value scopes.
I don't actually care if you use the latest terminology. You seem to have a wrong idea about how PEP 550 really works (and its full semantics), because things you say here about it don't make any sense. Yury _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
