On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 8:43 PM, Yury Selivanov <yselivanov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Koos Zevenhoven <k7ho...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Yury Selivanov <yselivanov...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> I don't actually care if you use the latest terminology. You seem to > >> have a wrong idea about how PEP 550 really works (and its full > >> semantics), because things you say here about it don't make any sense. > > > > > > In PEP 550, introducing a new LogicalContext on the ExecutionContext > affects > > the scope of > > any_var.set(value) for *any* any_var. > > Does that not make sense? > > It does. But your other sentence ".. You might get close by putting > just one variable in a LogicalContext and then nest them, but PEP 550 > does not allow this in all cases .." does not. > So you claim that PEP 550 does allow that in all cases? Or you don't think that that would get close? ––Koos -- + Koos Zevenhoven + http://twitter.com/k7hoven +
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
