On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 8:15 AM, Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 13 October 2017 at 23:30, Yury Selivanov <yselivanov...@gmail.com> wrote: >> At this point of time, there's just one place which describes one well >> defined semantics: PEP 550 latest version. Paul, if you have >> time/interest, please take a look at it, and say what's confusing >> there. > > Hi Yury, > The following is my impressions from a read-through of the initial > part of the PEP. tl; dr - you say "concurrent" too much and it makes > my head hurt :-) [..] > I hope this is of some use. I appreciate I'm talking about a pretty > wholesale rewrite, and it's quite far down the line to be suggesting > such a thing. I'll understand if you don't feel it's worthwhile to > take that route.
Hi Paul, Thanks *a lot* for this detailed analysis. Even though PEP 550 isn't going to make it to 3.7 and I'm not going to edit/rewrite it anymore, I'll try to incorporate some of your feedback into the new PEP. Thanks, Yury _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
