On 27 March 2018 at 18:19, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 6:56 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> [...] The implicit functions used in the >> comprehension & generator expression cases are just potentially >> simpler to handle, as we don't care about their API signatures, which >> means we can freely pollute their APIs with eager name bindings if we >> choose to do so. [...] >> > > Hm, so maybe we shouldn't touch lambda, but we can at least fix the scope > issues for comprehensions and genexprs. > Removing the implicit function scope in comprehensions is something I wanted for long time. It would not only "fix" the scoping, but will also fix the yield inside comprehensions. -- Ivan
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
