On 27 March 2018 at 19:43, Ethan Furman <et...@stoneleaf.us> wrote: > On 03/27/2018 11:12 AM, Ivan Levkivskyi wrote: >> >> On 27 March 2018 at 18:19, Guido van Rossum wrote: > >>> Hm, so maybe we shouldn't touch lambda, but we can at least fix the scope >>> issues for comprehensions and genexprs. >> >> >> Removing the implicit function scope in comprehensions is something I >> wanted for long time. >> It would not only "fix" the scoping, but will also fix the yield inside >> comprehensions. > > Can we do it without leaking names?
To me, that would be the ideal. I assume there are significant technical challenges, though, as otherwise I'd have thought that would have been the approach taken when Python 3 fixed the name leaking issue from Python 2. Paul _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
