Extending the original idea, IMHO it would make sense for the dict
constructor to create a new dictionary not only from several mappings, but
mixing mappings and iterables too.
Consider this example:
x = [(1, 'one')]
y = {2: 'two'}
Now: {**dict(x), **y}
Proposed: dict(x, y)
I think this extension makes the call ostensibly easier to read and grep. I
believe we are safe regarding compatibility issues, right?
What do you guys think?
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 4:44 AM, Mike Miller <python-id...@mgmiller.net>
wrote:
> Ok, we can haggle the finer details and I admit once you learn the syntax
> it isn't substantially harder. Simply, I've found the dict() a bit easier
> to mentally parse at a glance. Also, to add I've always expected multiple
> args to work with it, and am always surprised when it doesn't.
>
> Would never have thought of this unpacking syntax if I didn't know that's
> the way its done now, but often have to think about it for a second or two.
>
>
> On 2018-04-10 22:22, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 2:44 PM, Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 02:22:08PM +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-ideas mailing list
> Python-ideas@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
