Oh, I get it now, thanks! On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 2:11 AM, Serhiy Storchaka <storch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 12.04.18 22:42, Andrés Delfino пише: > >> I think the update method can (and personally, should) stay unchanged: >> >> spam.update(dict(x, y)) >> >> seems succinct and elegant enough, with the proposed constructor syntax. >> >> Sorry my ignorance, do (Mutable)Mapping ABC say anything about >> constructors? >> > > Mapping and MutableMapping ABCs don't have constructors, but many > dict-like objects imitate the dict constructor: accept a single mapping or > a sequence of pairs as a positional argument, and accept other dict as > kwargs. > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list > Python-ideas@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
