On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 11:17:13AM +0200, Stephan Houben wrote: > And the alternative is to replace all occurrences of > spam with 𝐬𝐩𝐚𝐦 , which has the same effect and also is > backward-compatible with 3.x for x < 8. > > So there is already a kind of solution available, albeit an ugly one.
You are kidding, I hope. If that works at all, I don't think its something we want to guarantee will work. And for what it's worth, what I see is eight empty boxes (missing glyph symbols). -- Steve _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
