On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 10:05 AM, Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info> wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 04:06:51AM +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 3:59 AM, Neil Girdhar <mistersh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > This example shows additional flexibility:
>> >
>> > z = {a: transformed_b
>> > for b in bs
>> > given transformed_b = transform(b)
>> > for a in as_}
>> >
>> > There is no nice, equivalent := version as far as I can tell.
>>
>> True. However, it took me several readings to understand what you were
>> doing here.
>
> Possibly you shouldn't have tried reading at 4am.
>
> Either that or I shouldn't be reading before I've had a coffee :-)
>
> Have I missed something that you have seen?
Yep, as mentioned in the other post. The fact that you talk like this
about it - asserting that it's obvious what this does, while still
considering it to be utterly useless - is proof, IMO, that this should
be frowned upon in style guides.
ChrisA
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
