The check is made against a boolean value in the C extension, I don't think that it offers a significant speed-up against the pure python code.
but it offers a simpler (reduced, global) assertion syntax though. ________________________________ From: Python-ideas <python-ideas-bounces+eloi.gaudry=fft...@python.org> on behalf of Kyle Lahnakoski <klahnako...@mozilla.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 5, 2018 7:25:45 PM To: python-ideas@python.org Subject: Re: [Python-ideas] Runtime assertion with no overhead when not active I currently use the form <control_flag> and log_function( <msg_expr> ) where <control_flag> is some module variable, usually "DEBUG". I do this because it is one line, and it ensures the log_function parameters are not evaluated. *IF* runtime assertions had a switch so they have no overhead when not active, how much faster can it get? How expensive is the <control_flag> check? On 2018-05-10 03:55, Barry Scott wrote: My logging example would be log( control_flag, msg_expr ) expanding to: if <control_flag>: log_function( <msg_expr> ) Barry This idea requires the same sort of machinery in python that I was hoping for to implement the short circuit logging.
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/