On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 12:04 AM, Mikhail V <mikhail...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 2:15 AM, Greg Ewing <greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz> > wrote: >> Mikhail V wrote: >>> > >> My feeling is that inserting is not a frequent enough operation >> to warrant having its own operator, especially not when there >> is already a syntax that does the same thing. > > Depends on what you count as 'insert' - append is one case of insert ;) > (logically seen) > > Sorry for repeating myself, the idea was that the default meaning is append(), > i.e. normal operator usage on list: > > L1 = L2 ^ item - would be same as > L1 = L2.append(item)
Advertising
Not sure exactly what your intention here is, because list.append mutates the list and returns None. Does "L2 ^ item" mutate L2 in place, or does it construct a new list? If it mutates in place, does it return the same list? Or if doesn't, how is it different from "L2 + [item]", which is a much more logical spelling of list addition? ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
