> On 21 Jul 2018, at 08:54, Jonathan Fine <jfine2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Steve > > Thank you for your message. I think my response below allows us to go move > forward. > > WHAT'S THE PROBLEM > You asked: > > What problem are you trying to solve? > > Its okay if there is no immediate problem, that you're just exploring > > alternative garbage collection strategies. Or if you're trying to remove > > the GIL. > > I'm exploring. I hope we'll find something that helps CPython run faster on > multi-core machines, at least for some users. I hope this helps you > understand where I'm coming from. >
I think that the problem that needs a solution is providing each thread with knowledge that is safe to update state. The questions that any solution needs to answer is then: 1) How does the solution provide each thread with the knowledge that it is safe to mutate state? 2) How does the solution manage the life time of the objects? For 1 today: In python all state is shared between all threads. One lock, the GIL, provides the code with the knowledge that it is safe to mutate state. For 2 today: The reference counts track the number of uses of an object. In the simple case when the ref count reaches 0 run the __del__ protocol. In the cases where circular reference patterns prevents detecting that an object is no longer needed via reference counts the exist python garbage collector figures out that such objects can be deleted. I'd note that the reference counts are just one piece of state of many pieces of state in an object. As an example of a idea that is looking directly at these questions is the work on using a sub-interpreter for each thread is interesting. It is aiming to solve (1) by using a per/interpreter lock, which will allow each thread to run at full speed. I'm following with interest how the life time management will work. In multi processing (1) is solved by no longer sharing object state. > Please, in this thread, can we confine ourselves to getting a better > understanding of multi-core reference count garbage collection. That is for > me already hard enough, in isolation, without mixing in other issues. I'd argue that the ref counts are not interesting at all, only a side effect of one possible solution to the object life time problem. Barry _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
