> To me, the "30% of all arguments" deserves more careful examination.
> Does the proposal significant improve the reading and writing of this
> code? And are there other, perhaps better, ways of improving this
> code?
Maybe my tool should be expanded to produce more nuanced data? Like how many of
those 30% are:
- arity 1,2,3, etc? (Arity 1 maybe should be discarded as being counted
unfairly? I don’t think so but some clearly do)
- matches 1 argument, 2,3,4 etc? Matching just one is of less value than
matching 5.
Maybe some other statistics?
/ Anders
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
