Michael Selik writes: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 2:13 AM Stephen J. Turnbull > <turnbull.stephen...@u.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote:
> > That's because completion of discussion has never been a requirement > > for writing a PEP. > > Not for drafting, but for submitting. For my own PEP submission, I > received the specific feedback that it needed a "proper title" before > being assigned a PEP number. What does that have to do with "completion of discussion"? I don't know what the editor told you, but in the PEP "proper title" is well- defined and not very stringent: "accurately describes the content". > My goal for submitting the draft was to receive a PEP number to > avoid the awkwardness of discussing a PEP without an obvious > title. Perhaps PEP 1 should be revised to clarify the expectations > for PEP submission. Good point. That's definitely grounds for refusing to approve the PEP, but the approval criteria are in the section "PEP Editor Responsibilities & Workflow". I'm submitting a pull request (python/peps #789 on GitHub) to also put it in the section "Submitting a PEP", under the bullet "The PEP editors review your PR for structure, formatting, and other errors." Steve _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
