> On 3 Feb 2019, at 09:54, Adrien Ricocotam <ricoco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Nice that you implemented it ! > > I think all the issues you have right now would go of using another > operation. I proposed the @ notation that is clear and different from > everything else, > plus the operator is called "matmul" so it completely makes sense.
The @ operator is meant for matrix multiplication (see PEP 465) and is already used for that in NumPy. IMHO just that is a good enough reason for not using @ as an elementwise application operator (ignoring if having an such an operator is a good idea in the first place). Ronald
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
