I don't understand what you mean. Can you provide examples that show the state of the dicts before and after and what the syntax would be the equivalent of in current python?
> On 9 Mar 2019, at 16:33, Jonathan Fine <jfine2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I've been thinking that it might be easier, in the long term, to make > a big step and allow >>>> a @update= b > as valid Python. What do you think? (I hope it will look nicer once > syntax highlighted.) > > For clarity, this would proceed via a.__iat_update__(b), and (a > @update b) would be similarly defined. > > As major disadvantage, of course, will be that >>>> gu...@python.org > would no longer be valid Python! > > And also we might have fewer animated discussions. > -- > Jonathan > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list > Python-ideas@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
