On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 10:38 PM MRAB <pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com> wrote:
> Well, I suppose it could work with parentheses, but not necessarily in
> the way you want/expect. If customer_wants("spam") returns False, then
> (quux("spam", "eggs", "sausage", "spam") unless customer_wants("spam"))
> could mean ()! (You could say that it doesn't, and if you want that
> behaviour then you should add a trailing comma.)I definitely don't want that (and I'm not particularly in favour of the original proposal anyway). In any case, (x) isn't a tuple, so it doesn't make sense to have it become one by the omission of its inner value; your parenthesized comment is the better option here, but has the same complexity that I was talking about. ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/GM6S7AQM2MFNRW55KUXGLT6FPVR3YN4C/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
