On 29/08/2019 00:24, Andrew Barnert wrote:
On Aug 27, 2019, at 10:21, Rhodri James <rho...@kynesim.co.uk> wrote:
You make the point yourself: this is something we already understand from
dealing with complex numbers in other circumstances. That is not true of
generic single-character string prefixes.
It certainly is true for 1.23f.
I would contend that (and anyway 1.23f is redundant; 1.23 is already a
float literal). But anyway I said "generic single-character string
prefixes", because that's what the original proposal was. You seem to
be going off on creating literal syntax for standard library types
(which, for the record, I think is a good idea and deserves its own
thread), but that's not what the OP seems to be going for.
--
Rhodri James *-* Kynesim Ltd
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/326USPRMZIYO4WBCEWV4HJETQTTIVKMY/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
