On 2019-09-08 11:17, Mark @pysoniq wrote:
Hi, David,
In several other posts here, I have distinguished PysoniQ from the
open source projects mentioned. It has much better ease of use and
faster published metrics than the other projects mentioned. The
faster metrics should not be surprising when technologies like LLVM
are cut out of the loop and you translate Python directly to
assembly. The translate "directly" is critical for performance.
When you say, "But it's also not like there aren't already 5 or more
open source projects that do a similar thing better already" can you
be specific and provide examples of how they are better?
It's great that you are responding to all these nitpicks about what
PysoniQ does and doesn't do and how it is or isn't better than other
things. But I still haven't seen your response to Chris Angelico's
question, which I'll reiterate here: what is your "idea"?
You just keep posting about the features of PysoniQ without explaining
why you've even brought it up on this list. What action are you
intending anyone here to take? Are you planning for PysoniQ to be
incorporated into core Python?
--
Brendan Barnwell
"Do not follow where the path may lead. Go, instead, where there is no
path, and leave a trail."
--author unknown
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/P5FOO2QSRQRIEZVHLOO2RQ3NIAFCIOMJ/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
