On Dec 4, 2019, at 12:14, Mike Miller <python-id...@mgmiller.net> wrote: > > >> On 2019-12-04 11:05, David Mertz wrote: >> I've often wanted named loops. I know approaches to this have been proposed >> many times, and they all have their own warts. E.g. an ad hoc pseudo code >> that may or may not match any previous proposal: >> for x in stuff as outer: >> for y in other_stuff as inner: >> ... >> if cond: >> break outer >> But we all manage without it. > > +1 Nice, find myself with that problem about once a year and it is annoying > to code around
If you want to change this from an aside to a real proposal, it’s probably worth starting a new thread (and providing a real-life use case—if we all run into it once a year, many people probably won’t remember exactly what it looked like when they last ran into it, and how much their workaround bothered them). _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/JUGJIGEMT7KZ345VYM4CWJD2XWPKPQEH/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
