On Dec 4, 2019, at 12:14, Mike Miller <python-id...@mgmiller.net> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 2019-12-04 11:05, David Mertz wrote:
>> I've often wanted named loops. I know approaches to this have been proposed 
>> many times, and they all have their own warts. E.g. an ad hoc pseudo code 
>> that may or may not match any previous proposal:
>> for x in stuff as outer:
>>     for y in other_stuff as inner:
>>         ...
>>         if cond:
>>             break outer
>> But we all manage without it.
> 
> +1  Nice, find myself with that problem about once a year and it is annoying 
> to code around 

If you want to change this from an aside to a real proposal, it’s probably 
worth starting a new thread (and providing a real-life use case—if we all run 
into it once a year, many people probably won’t remember exactly what it looked 
like when they last ran into it, and how much their workaround bothered them).
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/JUGJIGEMT7KZ345VYM4CWJD2XWPKPQEH/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to