On 2019-12-04 11:05, David Mertz wrote:
I've often wanted named loops. I know approaches to this have been proposed many
times, and they all have their own warts. E.g. an ad hoc pseudo code that may or
may not match any previous proposal:
for x in stuff as outer:
for y in other_stuff as inner:
...
if cond:
break outer
But we all manage without it.
+1 Nice, find myself with that problem about once a year and it is annoying to
code around.
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/O6GZEZFHW7GEPJJ2U6DRON2J6DP6ICGL/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
